Spring 2003 / Geography 207 / Confidential

Evaluator:__________________________

PEER EVALUATION OF PORTFOLIOS

(http://faculty.washington.edu/krumme/207/03/peereval.html)

4 = Exceptional | 3 = Exceeds Expections | 2 = Meets Expectations | 1 = Could Be Improved


REVIEWED PAPER PORTFOLIO +/or WEBSITE __________________________(Name)
Please use separate forms for your 3 selections | Please circle "Paper" +/or Website, as appropriate

Score
  • PORTFOLIO CONTENT (e.g. Depth; Conceptually rich? Informative? Interesting? Economic Geography? Related to Theme?)


  • ___
  • QUALITY OF WRITING OF INDIVIDUAL PORTFOLIO COMPONENTS (e.g. Quality of Formulations, Grammar, Spelling, Use of Subheadings, Appearance)


  • ___
  • QUALITY OF RESOURCES & EXTERNAL LINKS (e.g. Diversity, Appropriateness, Completeness & Quality of Citations & Annotations of References, Organization [incl. use of subheadings] of RESOURCE PAGE)


  • ___
  • COMPREHENSIVENESS, ORGANIZATION, APPEARANCE & DESIGN of the (ENTIRE) PORTFOLIO (e.g. Integration of Various Class Assignments; Use of Internal Links; Ease of Navigation; Directory [Site Map; Table of Content], Links to Subheadings etc.), SPECIAL EFFECTS (e.g. appropriate use of illustrations and graphics, if any)


  • ___
  • QUALITY of DISCUSSION CONTRIBUTIONS, 5th-HOUR-, or GROUP Component(s): (e.g. Explanation of Objectives, Links to Economic Geography, Journal, Use of Skills in Group)


  • ___
  • ACCESS & CLARITY OF ORAL RESPONSES TO YOUR QUESTIONS in Class AND/OR EASE OF ONLINE ACCESS & QUALITY OF HYPERTEXTUAL PRESENTATION:


  • ___
  • Other Comments:_____________________________________________________________
  • ___