








Class:
MWF 11:30-12:20
Location:
Chem. Library 21
Contact:
K.
Gillis-Bridges
Office:
Padelford A-16
Phone:
543-4892
Office
Hours: TTh 10:30-11:30
and
by appointment
Page
updated 1/27/00
Comments
or inquiries
|
Grading Criteria
for Group Web Project
An
A-Range (3.5-4.0) Web Site
An
A-range Web Site:
-
Has a
substantive thesis, purpose, and/or set of goals and fully explores that
thesis, purpose and/or set of goals
-
Individual
pages offer defendable, clearly explained, and supported theses
-
Shows
substantial depth, fullness and complexity of thought
-
Expresses
ideas clearly and commands the reader’s attention
-
Demonstrates
clear, unified and coherent organization
-
Is fully
developed and detailed with arguments supported by persuasive reasoning,
well chosen images and links, and references to films under study;
there is an appropriate balance between providing evidence and analyzing
that evidence
-
Has superlative
page design: clear text and images, skillful use of color, no clutter;
all images, links, and animations serve a purpose
-
Has a
sophisticated style (remarkable variety of sentence pattern, smooth transitions
between ideas, superior control of diction)
-
Has few,
if any, minor errors in grammar, usage or mechanics
A B-Range
(2.5-3.4) Web Site
A B-range
Web site:
-
Has a
clear thesis, purpose, and/or set of goals; but may not fully explore thesis,
purpose, or set of goals
-
Individual
pages offer theses that may be clear and well-argued, but could use additional
support or development
-
Shows
some depth and complexity of thought
-
Expresses
ideas clearly
-
Demonstrates
effective organization
-
Is well
developed with sensible reasoning, links, images, or references to film
under study; however, some evidence may detract from the thesis, purpose
or goals and some ideas might not be fully explored
-
Demonstrates
balance between evidence and analysis for the most part, but balance may
be weak in places
-
Integrates
text and images effectively
-
Has strong
page design: clear text and images, effective use of color, minimal clutter;
the majority of images, links, and animations work toward a purpose
-
Has an
effective style (some variety of sentence patterns, transitions between
ideas, accurate diction)
-
Has few
errors in grammar, usage or mechanics
A
C-Range (1.5-2.4) Web Site
A C-range
Web site:
-
Has a
thesis, purpose, and/or set of goals that may not be entirely clear
-
Individual
pages have theses that may not be completely clear, arguable, or supported
-
Shows
insufficient awareness of the complexity of issues addressed; may offer
simplistic or repetitive analysis
-
Communicates
ideas clearly for the most part, but may have some lapses in clarity
-
Has a
recognizable organizational pattern, but the relation among parts is not
consistently clear enough to provide a coherent focus
-
Is unevenly
developed; writers may offer sufficient reasoning, links, images, or references
to films for some of the ideas but not for others
-
Demonstrates
some balance between evidence and analysis
-
Integrates
text and images adequately
-
Has adequate
page design: satisfactory text and images, adequate use of color, some
page clutter; some images, links, and animation do not work toward a purpose
-
Has an
adequate style (limited variation in sentence patterns, transitions between
most ideas, diction accurate for the most part)
-
Has some
errors in grammar, usage or mechanics, but demonstrates basic control of
these areas
A
D-Range (.7-1.4) Web Site
A D-range
Web site:
-
Has an
unclear thesis, purpose and/or set of goals
-
Individual
pages offer unclear or simplistic theses that show limited knowledge of
the film
-
Lacks
focus or demonstrates confused, stereotyped or simplistic thinking; writers
may demonstrate no overall conception of the issues raised by the film
-
May not
communicate ideas clearly
-
Is ineffectively
organized, with no clear relationship between the parts of the essay
-
May not
provide adequate or appropriate reasoning, links, images, or film references
to support generalizations, or may provide details without generalizations
-
Demonstrates
little relationship between evidence and analysis
-
Uses images
and text, but with little connection between the two
-
Has weak
page design: some confusing text and images, poor use of color (glaring),
page clutter; many images, links, and animations do not work toward a purpose
-
Has stylistic
weaknesses (no variety of sentence patterns, few transitions, imprecise
diction)
-
Has occasional
major errors in grammar, usage or mechanics or frequent minor errors that
interfere in the reader's understanding of the essay
A
F (0.0) Web Site
A F
Web Site:
-
Has no
identifiable thesis, purpose, and/or set of goals
-
Individual
pages have incomprehensible theses that do not address the film
-
May be
deliberately off-topic and demonstrate no understanding of the issues raised
by the film
-
Does not
communicate ideas clearly
-
Lacks
coherent organization
-
Shows
no development of ideas; may simply summarize film
-
Has no
connection between text and images
-
Has incoherent
page design: unclear text and images, no sense to color choice, clutter
makes page incomprehensible; images, links, and animations have little
or no purpose
-
Has an
incoherent style (difficulties with sentence structure, pattern of diction
errors)
-
Has pervasive
pattern of errors in grammar, usage and mechanics that renders the essay
unreadable
|