INSTRUCTORS
Professor James W. Harrington
serves as the lead instructor. His office is 303D Smith Hall;
telephone 206-616-3821; electronic mail jwh@u.washington.edu.
His website is http://faculty.washington.edu/jwh
.
TIMES AND PLACES
The class meets as a whole from 1:00 - 2:20 on Mondays and Fridays
in 415 Smith Hall (the Geography Collaboratory). Lab sections
meet once a week (12:30 - 1:50 on Wednesdays, or 11:30 - 12:50 on Thursdays),
in 401 Smith Hall (a.k.a. the Sherman Lab).
Professor Harrington's office hours (303D Smith Hall) are 2:30
- 4:00 on Mondays, and by appointment.
Mr. Dent's office hours are 2:30 - 3:20 on Mondays and Wednesdays
in 401 Smith Hall, and 11:30 - noon on Mondays in 417 Smith Hall.
REQUIREMENTS
Class meetings and labs. The class will meet as a whole
in the Collaboratory. The instructors (and occasional guests) will
present material, ask questions, answer questions, and lead discussions.
These sessions will focus on concepts and principles, primarily (though
not exclusively) in support of the lab assignments.
Readings. We will be using an assortment of readings, accessible through a variety of means:
Yue-Hong Chou. 1997.
Exploring
Spatial Analysis in GIS.
This is a very easy-to-read
book, currently out of print. Chapter 7 is on electronic reserve.
Nicholas Chrisman.
1997. Exploring Geographic Information Systems.
(see the supporting site:
http://faculty.washington.edu/chrisman/explor/index.html
)
This book does a wonderful
job of placing “GIS” in a systematic and conceptual context, and emphasizing
the problems of representing the world in bits and bytes (as well as in
lines and colors). We will not assign material from this book, but
any of you intending to be GIS specialists should read it. We have
placed a copy on reserve at OUGL.
Keith C. Clarke. 1999.
Getting
Started with Geographic Information Systems.(see the supporting site:
http://www.prenhall.com/clarke
)
We will read most chapters
of this introductory book; the others are useful as enrichment.
It was ordered for this course at the University Bookstore;
we have placed a copy on (24-hour) reserve at OUGL.
Avijit Ghosh and Sara L.
McLafferty. 1987. Location Strategies for Retail and Service
Firms.
This book is, sadly,
out of print. Chapter 3 is on electronic reserve; the book
is on 4-hour reserve at OUGL.
Arthur M. Hughes. 1995.
The
Complete Database Marketer: Second-Generation Strategies and Techniques
for Tapping the Power of Your Customer Database (sec. ed.).
This book is written
for the marketing professional. It's commercially oriented, not explicitly
geographic, and quite sophisticated. It's on 4-hour reserve at OUGL.
Ken Jones and Jim Simmons.
1990. The Retail Environment.
We have placed only one
chapter from this book on electronic reserve (primarily for copyright reasons),
but the entire book is very useful for those of you interested in marketing
geography. The book is on 4-hour reserve at OUGL.
Paul Longley and Graham Clarke.
1996. GIS for Business and Service Planning.
We would like to have
you read four chapters from this book; all the chapters are useful.
It was ordered for this course at the University Bookstore;
we have placed a copy on reserve at OUGL.
John Pickles, ed. 1995.
Ground
Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems.
We are assigning only
one chapter from this book, though all the chapters are very interesting.
That one chapter is on electronic reserve; we have placed a copy
of the book on reserve at OUGL.
Edward J. Taaffe, Howard
L. Gauthier, and Morton E. O'Kelly. 1996. Geography of Transportation,
sec. ed.
This is a recent revision
of a classic text. Only one chapter from this book is on electronic
reserve, though all of Part Two (Chapters 7-10) is useful. The book
is on 4-hour reserve at OUGL.
Lab assignments. The course is organized into five
units: an introduction to the subject matter and the software,
three hands-on cases, and student-led (team) projects. The lab sections
will focus on these assignments, which will require additional student
work (outside of classes and labs) on computers that are fitted with ArcView
and the relevant extensions. (In other words, most of you will need
to find time each week to come to the Geography department labs).
Each of the cases will have a set of “deliverables”: screen shots,
answers to specific questions, and (much more importantly) a well-written
report to your hypothetical supervisor or client (what was the problem
at hand, how did you approach it, what did you find, and what concerns
do you have about your findings).
Tests. There will be two in-class tests (each with short-answer and short-essay components) on concepts, principles, and lab experiences.
Project. Students should form teams of 3-4 to develop and
produce a project, using data on the City of Seattle to develop a case
similar to any of the three lab cases. We will discuss this assignment
in class and section; students should individually propose projects
by Friday 4 February, and propose team assignments (and identify
likely data sources) by Friday 18 February. The time that
the University has scheduled for a final exam (plus 30 mintes: 2:30
- 5:00 p.m. Monday 13 March) will be devoted to team presentations.
The project (worth 15 of the 100 points for the course) will be graded
on the basis of: the group presentation; a team-written report (what
was the case scenario, what data were available, what overall approach,
what techniques, what findings); and individual self-assessments.
|
GRADING
Grades on tests and assignments. Each test and assignment
will be graded on a percentage basis. Content, clarity, and format
all count in the grading of the assignments. Be especially careful
about plagiarism: more than three words in the order you read them
somewhere else (including on the WWW, including the instructors' lecture
notes) must be set off in quotation marks and given a full citation.
Final grades. The final grade for the course will be calculated
as follows. Each graded item (participation, three tests and three
assignments) can contribute up to a specified number of points toward the
quarter’s total that can equal up to 100 points. Each student’s final
grade reflects the number of these 100 points the student has earned during
the quarter.
3 cases, 10 points each |
30 points
|
2 tests, 20 points each |
40 points
|
small lab assignments and lab participation |
10 points
|
participation in class meetings |
5 points
|
student project |
15 points
|
TOTAL |
100 points
|
|
|
85 - 100 points |
|
70 - 84 points |
|
55 - 74 points |
|
45 - 55 points |
|
0 - 44 points |
|
Late assignments. Tests must be taken on the scheduled day, except by prior arrangement with the instructor or ex post written communication with the instructor based on illness (in this latter circumstance, the instructor will need documentation of your illness or that of someone in your care; this will be handled on a case-by-case basis). Assignments received after 5:00 on the due date will be penalized by 20 percentage points (e.g., a two-day-late assignment that is judged to be 85% successful would receive 65% credit); assignments 7 or more days after the due date will be penalized by 40 percentage points. Because of the deadlines for grading, the instructors cannot accept any material after 5:00 p.m. Thursday 16 March.
Incomplete work. [From the University Registrar's website] A grade of “I” (Incomplete) is given only when the student has been in attendance and has done satisfactory work until within two weeks of the end of the quarter and has furnished proof satisfactory to the instructor that the work cannot be completed because of illness or other circumstances beyond the student's control. To obtain credit for the course, an undergraduate student must convert an Incomplete into a passing grade no later than the last day of the next quarter. The student should never reregister for the course as a means of removing the Incomplete. An Incomplete grade not made up by the end of the next quarter is converted to the grade of 0.0 by the Registrar unless the instructor has indicated, when assigning the Incomplete grade, that a grade other than 0.0 should be recorded if the incomplete work is not completed. The original Incomplete grade is not removed from the permanent record.
3-7 January: Introduction