FIRST TEST
A. SHORT ANSWER [10 points]
Answer each question in the space provided. Do not use complete sentences.
UNITED STATES
National Income and Product Accounts, 1933-1997 (selected years)
GDP = C + I + G + X - M
where
GDP is given in billions of current dollars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1933 |
$ 56.2
|
82%
|
3%
|
15%
|
4%
|
3%
|
1945 |
223.2
|
54%
|
5%
|
42%
|
3%
|
3%
|
1965 |
719.1
|
62%
|
16%
|
21%
|
5%
|
4%
|
1973 |
1,382.6
|
62%
|
18%
|
21%
|
7%
|
7%
|
1987 |
4,692.3
|
66%
|
16%
|
21%
|
6%
|
11%
|
1998 |
8,759.9
|
67%
|
17%
|
17%
|
11%
|
13%
|
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis
U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS, 1998
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, International Accounts Data, Balance of Payments Tables
http://www.bea.doc.gov/bea/di/boptab1.pdf
(all figures in millions of current U.S. dollars)
1
|
Exports of goods, services, income |
1,192,231
|
3
|
Goods, excluding military |
670,246
|
4
|
Services (travel, royalties, private services) |
263,661
|
12
|
Income receipts on U.S. assets abroad |
258,324
|
18
|
Imports of goods, services, and income |
-1,368,718
|
20
|
Goods, excluding military |
-917,178
|
21
|
Services (travel, royalties, private services) |
-181,011
|
29
|
Income payments on foreign assets in U.S. |
-270,529
|
35
|
Unilateral transfers, net |
-44,075
|
40
|
U.S. assets abroad, net change |
-292,818
|
55
|
Foreign assets in U.S., net change |
502,637
|
70
|
Statistical discrepancy |
-10,743
|
71
|
Balance on goods = (3) + (20) |
-246,932
|
72
|
Balance on services = (4) + (21) |
82,650
|
73
|
Balance on goods and services = (71) + (72) |
-164,282
|
76
|
Balance on current account = (1) + (18) + (35) = (40) + (55) + (70) |
-220,562
|
U.S. GDP, 1998 (1998 dollars) 8,759,900
ESSAY [30 points]
Write an essay that does the following:
1.Trace the historical development of practices and theories of international
trade (from mercantilism through new trade theory), as I did in class and
on-line. Note how each element in this development related to trends in
political, economic, or intellectual history. When you present the dominant
neoclassical model of trade, be sure to go on to explain what leads to
comparative advantage, and how we might resolve the Leontief paradox concerning
specialization, trade, and comparative advantage.
Write essays on two of the following three topics:
2.Present four arguments in favor of restrictive or protective trade policies, and critique each. (It's fine to conclude that some of the arguments remain strong, after your critique, if that's your reasoned conclusion).
3.What does "competitiveness" mean? Relate it to "comparative advantage." Why does Krugman argue that competitiveness is "a dangerous obsession": why is the analogy "wrong" in some sense, and what negative outcomes might follow from thinking about trade in this way?
4. Provide a brief, historical overview of Mexican or Canadian trade policy, relating the changes in the policy to economic, social, or political changes in the country and in the U.S.