| |
|
In my teaching I am employing a Participative Learning (PL) style that actively involves students in the process of teaching and learning. In almost all courses I am using what I have called the Expeditionary Triangle, which connects theory with real-world cases involving an instrument or a tool. Those three elements I demonstrate to students effectively inform and influence each other.
Student group work within a term project (the
expedition) is a capstone in my PL approach, which
always requests a hindsight reflection on the group
process. Such debriefings I believe enhance
students’ social process awareness and improve
individual and group capabilities of learning and
performing in teams. Since my arrival at the UW
iSchool I have predominantly taught courses in two
programs, that is, the Master of Information
Management Program (MSIM) and the Master of Library
and Information Science Program (MLIS). Also, I am
teaching a course sequence in the UW Business
School’s Global Executive Program.
Over the past five years I have prepared from
scratch seven courses, four of which were core
courses and three electives. One of the core courses
was prepared for distance mode learning. The courses
address various dimensions of Information Management
and their organizational ramifications. Most courses
I teach are for Executive level students who pursue
a master’s degree while being employed in industry
or government. Those students typically hold
leadership or senior professional positions in their
organizations.
In my teaching, I always introduce findings from
most recent research including my own. According to
the consistent feedback, which I have received over
the years, in both the classroom and distance mode
my students benefit from the PL-based course design
and the relevancy to practice originating in my own
practitioner experience in the ICT industry. Courses
topically range from Change Management, Emerging
Trends in Technology and Management, Management of
Information Organizations to special topics such as
Finance, Marketing, and Information Systems in a
Global Enterprise. Both student and peer evaluations
of my teaching have been very favorable.
to top of page
|
| |
to top of page
|
| |
-
System Thinking and System Dynamics,
at the Zurich MBA Forum, Zurich Switzerland, Marck 1999
-
E-Business: What’s so new?
At the Zurich MBA Congress, Zurich, Switzerland, October
2000
-
E-Government: Current Issues and Practices,
(PBAF 598) at the Evans School, Univ. of Washington,
(Instructor: David Tetta), Seattle, WA, January 2005
-
Information, Information Systems, Strategic Success, & the
Sourcing Mix,
at the Zurich MBA Congress, Zurich, Switzerland, October
2004
-
IT Sourcing: Strategic Challenges,
at the Zurich MBA Forum, Zurich, Switzerland, March 2005
-
E-Government: Current Issues and Practices,
(PBAF 598) at the Evans School, Univ. of Washington,
(Instructor: David Tetta), Seattle, WA, January 2005
-
Challenges in E-Gov Research,
at the e-Gov PhD Colloquium, Copenhagen Business School,
Copenhagen/Denmark, August 2005
to top of page
|
| |
-
Member, Supervisory Committee of Patricia Katopol (graduated
2006), Shuhua Liue, and Chic Naumer
-
Member, Advisory Committee of Tim Carlson
to top of page
|
| |
| |
According to
Ernst von Glasersfeld (1995), human "knowledge is not
passively received but built up by the cognizing
subject" (p. 18); the author also holds that "the
function of cognition is adaptive and serves the
organization of the experimental world, not the
discovery of ontological reality" (ibid). Those two
principles (re)define the way teaching and learning have
traditionally been interpreted. It also dramatically
changes the instructor's role and function in the
learning process from a conveyor of knowledge to a
facilitator of learning. Thus, teaching and learning as
complex and intertwined social processes receive a new
meaning inside and outside the classroom.
I will continue to
post important material in this regard at this site.
Below are links to three documents, which highlight (1)
the various schools of thought regarding human
knowledge, (2) the introvert individual's approach to
learning, and (3) the extrovert's approach to learning.
I owe these documents to Mark Unno from the University of Oregon. You may find many more
interesting materials at his
website.
|
to top of page
|
|
|