UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON

School of Business Administration

MGMT 521: Strategic Management of Innovation and Technology

Instructor: Emer Dooley, Lewis 111

Phone: 206-369-7248

Email :emer@u.washington.edu

Class Hours: Monday and Wednesday 3:30-5:20

Office Hours: Monday and Wednesday 2:30-3:20

Reading: Packet available from Balmer copy center. Additional readings will be handed out during the quarter.

Course Objectives

Innovation and new product development are crucial sources of competitive advantage. This is as true today as it was when the seed drill, plow, spinning jenny and steam engine started the industrial revolution 250 years ago. This class will examine the centrality of technology and innovation to competitive advantage from a number of angles and explore some interesting topics such as why:

·         Innovators may not profit from innovation

·         Good management can be fatal; Bad management can lead to success.

·         Winning market share can mean losing the war

·         Failure can be an asset and success a liability

The course will be divided into the following sections.

  1. Are the dynamics of competition in technology industries different?
  2. Is it possible to make big strategic bets successfully?
  3. What strategies should companies use to direct innovation?
  4. Can large companies innovate successfully?
  5. What broader issues affect the success of technology-based companies?

Teaching Method

The course is a mix of cases, readings, lectures and a group project. Emphasis will be on case analysis and the project. Cases are on technology companies such as Intel, Monsanto, 3M, HP and Red Hat; the industries span the gamut from agricultural biotechnology to semiconductors. Since case studies concentrate on large (i.e. in this context, abstract) corporations, you will be required to work with a local high tech company on a real problem to add some balance, as detailed below.

Grading

Course grade will be assigned as follows:

Not-quite-midterm exam:                        30%

Group project

Oral presentation           15%

Written report                25%

Peer review                    10%

Class participation.                                20%

Project

The group paper should research an industry and one firm which is (or hopes to be) a player in this industry. The analysis of the firm and its market, using the concepts and frameworks of the course should not exceed 10 pages (excluding appendices) and consist of the following sections:

Industry analysis:   What are the key markets and technology trends that this innovation addresses? Technologies or markets you might look at include proteomics, RFID, the future of voice communications, WiFi, audio electronics, space, biotechnology, semiconductors, retail, real estate??

E.g. (Some!) Key market trends for wireless email:

·         Growth in the number of mobile professionals

·         Growth in internal corporate use; displacement of wired communication

·         Wireless email installed base and growth in availability of WiFi

·         Saturation of the PC space driving alternative growth paths

·         Generation of wired individuals: Early adopters on 5th or 6th device; Laggards on 1st.

Technology trends

·         Standards battles Wifi 802.11x

·         WPA-2 security standard

·         Connection speed issues and broadband

·         Etc. etc. etc.

 

Company profile: Pick one company, or division within a company that you can gain access to that competes in this space. Outline (briefly) the history of the company, explain the technology and describe the market advantage the company has, and its plan for disruption.

 

Assessment: Your assessment of the firm’s strategy using the principles we have covered in class and recommendations for going forward.

 

Required Appendix: At least one company interview in full text: Q&A format.

 

Report grading: Four equally weighted criteria:

1.       Is the analysis insightful? Does it go beyond describing what happened and speculate on why it happened

2.       How well the class concepts are integrated

3.       Readability, ease of explanation of concepts and ideas, structure and grammar.

4.       Relevance and usefulness of recommendations. 

 

 


 

Class Schedule

Part I: Competition in technology driven industries

Monday, January 3rd

Lecture: Innovation, competition and competitive advantage

 

 Part II:  Strategy and Corporate Innovation: The giants of R&D

 

            Wednesday January 5th

Lecture: Technology Strategy- different models for R&D

Readings: Read: Discipline of Innovation, Peter Drucker, HBR 2002; Creativity is not enough, Theododre Levitt, HBR 2002.

Movie: Silicon Magic

 

Monday, January 10th

Case: Intel Labs (A) Photolithography strategy in crisis

Readings: Exploring the limits of the technology S-curve. Clayton Christensen Disruptive Technologies: Catching the wave.

http://www.genus.com/investor/primer.html Semiconductor primer

 

Wednesday January 12th

Case: Monsanto’s march into biotechnology [A]

Reading: Built to last: BHAG chapter

Short lecture: Biotechnology industry in 2005

 

Monday January 17th

No class. Martin Luther King Holiday

 

Wednesday January 19th

Case: Intel Corp. 1968-2003

Guest: Matt Gordon, Intel Capital

 

Monday January 24th

Case: Airbus A3XX: Developing the world's largest commercial jet (A)

.

 

Wednesday, January 26th

Case: HP The flight of the Kittyhawk

Reading: Value networks and the impetus to innovate. Chapter 2 of "The Innovators Dilemma" by Clayton Christensen

 

Part III: Fostering Innovation in the corporation

 

Monday, January 31st

Case: Innovation at 3M Corporation (A)

Reading: Lead-user research. Thomke and Nimgade

 

 

Wednesday February 2nd

 

Case: Boeing and the 7E7

Guest: John Feren VP Sales, Marketing and In-service Support, Boeing 7E7

 

Part IV Managing the New Product Development Process

 

Monday, February 7th  Internal Development

Case: Linking Strategy and Innovation: Materials Technology Corporation.

Reading: Wheelwright and Clark. Creating Project plans to focus product development

 

Wednesday February 9th Distributed Development

            Case: Red Hat and the Linux Revolution

 

Monday, February 14th Alliance/Partnering for development

Case: Cambridge Laboratories: Proteomics

 

Wednesday February 16th Leveraging the development of others

Case: Virgin Mobile USA.

 

Monday February 21st

Presidents Day –Holiday

 

Wednesday, February 23rd

            Exam

 

Part V Broader issues in technology strategy

 

Monday February 28th Biotechnology and bioengineered foods

            Read: Pharmagedon, Michael Specter, New Yorker, 2000

 

Wednesday March 2nd Outsourcing and the future

Read: Economist special on outsourcing

Guest: Rajeev Agarwal, CEO MAQ Software

 

 

Monday March 7th and 9th

Group presentations

 

 

 

Other important deadlines

Project one-page proposal due Wednesday January 19th

Should include list of group members, the industry and company to be covered, and the name of the person you want to contact in the firm.

Draft for review due Wednesday February 16th.

Should be a draft that outlines all the sections you hope to cover and the text of the interview with your company contact.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case preparation questions

 

Monday January 10th

Case: Intel Labs (A) Photolithography strategy in crisis

1.       Is Intel’s photolithography strategy in crisis?

2.       How would you compare Intel’s and IBM’s R&D organization and spending? How would you characterize the success of each?

3.       What are the limits to a distributed research model?

4.       What are the pros and cons of each of Wilson’s options?

 

Wednesday January 12th

Case: Monsanto’s march into biotechnology [A]

1.       How is technology policy formulated at Monsanto? What are the advantages and disadvantages of that approach?

2.       What does it mean to become a “World force in biotechnology?” What capabilities will Monsanto need?

3.       What direction should Monsanto biotechnology research take? What areas of opportunity should it emphasize?

4.       How should Monsanto organize research? By function or market?

5.       What are the likely outcomes of Monsanto’s bet?

Wednesday January 19th

Case: Intel Corp. 1968-2003

  1. How well is Intel positioned today?
  2. What challenges internal and external is Intel facing?
  3. What would you propose to the board? Please explain the rationale of any strategic moves.

 

Monday January 24th

Case: Airbus A3XX: Developing the world's largest commercial jet (A)

1.       Why is Airbus building the A380? What are its objectives?

2.       How many aircraft does Airbus need to sell to break even on the investment? Is this more or less that the projected number of VLAs estimated for the next 20 years?

I will email a spreadsheet for you to work though your assumptions on this. To calculate the breakeven number: Calculate the present value of the required investment. Then calculate the present value of the cash flows from their projections of aircraft sales. Assume a risk premium of 6% .

3.  As Boeing, how do you respond to this?

4.  Is Airbus making the right decision?

 

Wednesday, January 26th

Case: HP The flight of the Kittyhawk

1.       How would you rate the strengths and weaknesses of the way HP structured and supported the Kittyhawk development team?

2.       What do you think of the way the team set out to find a market for the Kittyhawk? What did they do right or wrong?

3.       What do you think are the root causes of failure of the Kittyhawk program? Is there any way HP could have avoided those failures by addressing the root causes?

 

Monday, January 31st

Case: Innovation at 3M Corporation (A)

1.       How has 3M’s innovation process evolved since the company was founded? Why, if at all, does 3M, known as a “hothouse of innovation” need to regain its historic closeness to the customer?

2.       How does the lead-user-research method differ from, and complement other traditional market research methods?

3.       Has the surgical-medical team applied the lead-user research process successfully? Why or why not?

4.       What should the team recommend to Dunlop? What are the risks: To the team and to the lead-user research process?

 

Wednesday February 2nd

Case: Boeing and the 7E7

1.       What market is Boeing addressing?

2.       What are the key features of the 7E7?

3.       How does Boeing plan to bring the 7E7 to market?

4.       How will the 7E7 affect Boeing’s future?

 

Monday February 7th  Internal Development

Case: Linking Strategy and Innovation: Materials Technology Corporation.

1.       How would you characterize the various projects MTC has undertaken, in the framework proposed by Wheelwright and Clark?

2.       Is this the right set of projects for MTC?

3.       How many projects does MTC have the capacity to have underway at any point in time?

4.       If you were advising Spencer Quinn on how to build MTC into a successful company, what would you tell him?

Wednesday February 9th Distributed Development

Case: Red Hat and the Linux Revolution

1.       Why has open source software been so successful? What do you think the limits are to its application?

2.       How can Red Hat best exploit the opportunity created by open source going forward?

3.       What should Young do? Specifically should he fund the development of Linux applications?

 

Monday, February 14th Alliance/Partnering for development

Case: Cambridge Laboratories: Proteomics

1.       How has the drug discovery and the biotechnology industry changed over the last few years? How has Cambridge Laboratories competed since it was founded? How has it managed its growth?

2.       As Paul Henderson what questions do you want answered before you invest/ What’s your due diligence list?

3.       How do the business models of the two firms compare/contrast?

4.       How do the two cultures compare/contrast?

5.       Should Cambridge Labs invest in Cantebury Proteomics? Why or why not?

 

Wednesday February 16th

Case: Virgin Mobile USA: Pricing for the very first time

1.       What is Virgin Mobile’s target market? How should this influence its market entry strategy? Which pricing option would you choose and why?

2.       The cellular industry is notorious for churn. What is the source of this customer dissatisfaction? How have the various variable pricing variables (contracts, pricing buckets, hidden fees, off-peak etc ) affected the customer experience?

3.       How do the major carriers make money in this industry? Is there a financial logic underlying the pricing approach?

4.       What do you think of Virgin Mobile’s value proposition, channel and merchandising strategy?

5.       What do you think of Virgin’s market segments selection? Why do they see a gap here?