‘…What I am trying to do in my teaching is to stimulate students to think new thoughts for themselves, stimulate them to be good writers, to express their ideas clearly, stimulate them to be good in discussion.”
Prof. Renato Rosaldo, Jr.,
Lucie Stern Professor in Social Studies, Stanford University
Guidelines for
reading and class discussion
The readings you are
supposed to do at home are the starting point of class discussion and the
starting point of learning. Here are some strategies to help you with the
reading process and the preparation for class discussion:
Ê Take notes while reading.
Ë Establish the main point or hypothesis that the author is putting forward.
Most authors state it directly (e.g. my claim is that…, I will show that…, this
paper demonstrates that…., etc.), others are more oblique (in that case try to
determine what the paper is “about”, i.e., what is the most important thing the
author is trying to convey).
Ì In academic papers authors usually offer supporting evidence/arguments for their
claim. Make a list of these arguments and ways in which they support the main
point.
Í Having read the paper, if you are really
thorough, you should convert your notes into a summary. While note-taking we jot down many peripheral things which
happen to strike our fancy and which may or may not be relevant to the main
issues. A summary should include the main thesis and the arguments (points Ë & Ì), and be at most 2-3 pages
long.
Î Wow! You have now almost written a
publishable review of the paper! Almost, but not quite. What is missing?
Ï Evaluation of
the claim and the arguments. This is a crucial part. It may be that you are completely convinced.
Can you add your own arguments? Or, you may like the claim, but find the
evidence unconvincing. Can you then think of some better arguments than the
ones used by the author? Or, you may believe the main thesis is totally
misguided and the evidence misused, misinterpreted, amenable to other
explanations, etc. If so, it is a good idea to think why the author is making
this “mistake”.
Ð Voilà! If you followed steps Ê-Ï you are now ready to
discuss the paper with others. The whole enterprise is to get you to absorb
facts, yes, but also to learn to think critically, evaluate general
philosophical positions, as well as specific claims and arguments. AND to
expose you to academic discourse in which people may disagree with one another,
but allow for different interpretations and can be convinced by well-founded
arguments. Persuading others to “see things your way” through rational argument
is very empowering.