Week III-beg. Week IV
Culture of Kievan Rus
Required Reading:
- Franklin and Shepard, as previously assigned, esp. chs. 4, 6.
- Web page on conversion. Several of the primary
source readings immediately below are linked to this page.
- Levin, "Dvoeverie and Popular
Religion." Note: this article is not confined principally to materials
on the Kievan period, but it is extremely valuable for conceptualization of how we can
best make sense of religion in Russia and assess the impact of the coming of
Christianity. It is an important response to, among other things, some of the points
made in the discussion by Florovsky et al. in the recommended readings.
- The conversion tale in the
Russian Primary Chronicle. Note: You do not have the whole text here.
This selection omits Vladimir's pagan past and shortens substantially the
"testing" of the various faiths, their expositions of their beliefs, etc.
- The church statutes of Vladimir
and Iaroslav, as
previously assigned.
- Metropolitan Ilarion's "Sermon
on Law and Grace." this text is normally considered to be one of the best
examples of the mastery of formal Byzantine rhetoric by a native of Rus' whose education
was undoubtedly exceptional. Whether Hilarion, one of the few natives of Rus' to
preside over its church in the early centuries, really wrote the whole thing is
questionable. Of some interest is the section of the work praising Prince Vladimir
and calling him our "Kaghan" (the title of the Khazar rulers!).
- Prince Vladimir Monomakh's
"Testament". Included in the Primary Chronicle, this document seems to
be a genuine "instruction" of Monomakh to his sons and shows in interesting ways
the juxtaposition of his faith with his accounting of his real world activities. It
captures something of the "princely culture" of the early 12th century and also
provides insights into Rus' relations with the nomadic Polovtsy. This will be useful
to read in conjunction with the web page on the culture of the princely courts, as is the
Igor' Tale.
- Haney and Dahl, On the Campaign of Igor: 1. Introduction; 2. Text; 3. Commentary.
- Web pages on art and architecture. You might start by at least skimming the pages
on the background of Byzantine architecture and
the development of Christian iconography, since
these will help your understanding of the extent of Byzantine artistic influence in Kiev
and the basic principles underlying the art. You should definitely read the
introductory comments on the Art of Kievan Rus and
about the Cathedral of Sancta Sophia and its
cultural setting. The latter will allow you to take a tour to see some of the other
buildings in medieval Kiev. Once you have done that, explore the Christian imagery in the cathedral, and then move on
to the imagery of the Kievan royal court. The
pages on the art of the Principality of Vladimir
provide some interesting insights into the place of the principality in the European
cultural context of the late 12th century and material on the cultural context of the
"Igor' Tale," insofar as that epic poem seems to have been the product of one of
the contemporary princely courts.
Recommended reading:
- Florovsky, Andreyev and Billington, "The
Problem of Old Russian Culture." This discussion is very stimulating, although
many of the authors' statements are in need of revision. Florovsky's main point is
not always clear, although he provides a good sense of the ways in which previous writers
have interpreted or misinterpreted the "Old Russian" cultural experience.
One needs to keep in mind that his particular concerns about "intellectual
silence" reflect to some extent his expertise as a historian of Russian theology.
Points he makes need to be re-considered in the light of Levin's arguments and
especially those by Veder (see below). She also presents significant alternatives to
some of Andreyev's assertions. One important point that crops up in the discussion
is the idea that the Mongols cut Russia off from the West, which simply is not true, as we
will discover a bit later in the course.
- Veder, "Old Russia's Intellectual Silence
Reconsidered." A response to Florovsky et al. and to more recent work by F. J.
Thomson. This article is important for raising basic questions concerning whether
Slavic bookmen and their readers did not, perhaps, have a distinctive understanding of the
function of the written text. Veder makes what some see as a defect of the early Rus
compilations into a virtue. It is easy to read around his (for the general reader)
somewhat abstruse examples for his main points.
- Franklin,
"Literacy and Documentation in Early Medieval Russia." Franklin's
conclusions can also be found in your course book by Franklin and Shepard. The
subject of literacy is much misunderstood though; his fuller analysis here is well worth
reading.
Study questions:
- What do we learn from the primary sources about the pre-Christian religious beliefs of
the Rus and their subjects?
- To what degree do such beliefs and practices seem to have survived the coming of
Christianity?
- Why was Eastern Orthodox Christianity the religion of choice for Olga and Vladimir?
- To what degree was the culture of Byzantium accepted and spread in Kievan Rus? (Consider
specific evidence in primary sources.)
- Does the "Igor Tale" in any way seem to contradict what we know from other
sources about the culture of late Kievan Rus? Does it provide us with information
that we would not otherwise know?
Question for Paper Two (draft to be posted no later than 12 noon, Sunday, January 23;
class discussion on Monday, January 24):
To what extent do the surviving sources (archaeological, artistic, and written) inform
us about the culture of the mass of the population in Kievan Rus? If, in fact, we
seem to know little about the culture of the masses, then whose culture are we seeing in
the sources? To what degree does that culture seem to have been influenced by
Byzantium and to what degree does it appear that Byzantine culture was adapted to
accomodate local tradition?
Link to Peer Review Page for Week III/beg. Week IV assignment [disconnected as of
March 20, 2000].