Sociological
and Evolutionary Theories (part 1)
"Science is built with
facts as a house is with stones--but a collection of facts is no more a
science than a heap of stones is a house."
- Jules Henry Poincare
Major Sociological Theories
Conflict theory - focuses
on groups (or categories of people) competing for power or limited resources
-
social problems = outgrowths
of these conflicts
critique:
-
why is there competition
for power?
-
individuals do not follow
their "group" interests
-
emphasis on competition =
good
Functionalism - focuses on
survival needs of society, smooth functioning, society as a system
-
social problems = malfunctions
of system
critique:
-
difficulty in determining
what societal needs are
-
difficulty in determining
when system is failing
-
difficulty in determining
when societies die
-
emphasis on systems = good
standard social science
model (Cosmides & Tooby)
-
humans have general cognitive
& emotional abilities
-
no evolutionary basis to
social phenomena
-
human mind = blank slate
(tabula rasa)
-
no grand theory
Evolutionary Theory
"The Evangelical Lutheran
Church in America doesn't have an official position on creation vs. evolution,
but we subscribe to the historical-critical method of biblical interpretation,
so we believe God create the universe and all that is therein, only not
necessarily in six 24-hour days, and that he may have actually have used
evolution in the process of creation." (ELCA web page)
"Our Lutheran roots compel
us to search for the truth …. Prepare to be boldly challenged and gently
encouraged to join us in the search for the truth." (PLU web page)
Why evolution in this
class?
-
unifies the vast array of
empirical results in social science, connects to biological sciences
"Nothing in biology makes
sense except in the light of evolution."
- Theodosius Dobzhansky
-
evolution = process of change
in living organisms as a result of natural selection
points for discussion:
-
did Darwin discover evolution?
-
3 key components of natural
selection
-
2 main problems adaptations
address
-
Hamilton's inclusive fitness
theory
-
Williams' criteria for adaptation
-
adaptations we'll focus on
= evolved psychological mechanisms
"Psychology underlies culture
and society, and biological evolution underlies psychology"
- Jerome Barkow
-
evolutionary theory and genetic
determinism
-
are adaptations immutable?
-
are individuals walking inclusive
fitness calculators?
-
are current adaptations optimally
designed?
We are living fossils!
-
does evolutionary theory
imply that people are consciously trying to spread their genes?
-
byproducts of adaptations
Summary:
-
evolution gave rise to our
complex psychological adaptations
-
natural selection, as characterized
by inclusive fitness theory = key driver to evolution of these adaptations
-
individuals execute psychological
adaptations, consciously or unconsciously
-
adaptations increased inclusive
fitness of our ancestors, but may or may not be adaptive currently
-
genes = fundamental unit
of evolution
-
some abilities are byproducts
of adaptations
nature/nurture
Sociological and Evolutionary
Theories (part 2)
for discussion:
other types of selection
sexual selection - evolution
through:
1) besting same sex competitors
2) being preferentially
chosen as a mate by opposite sex
kin selection - evolution
through favoring closer vs. distant kin
More on adaptations
-
humans have many evolved
psychological mechanisms, focused on particular adaptive problems in specific
domains
-
we only appear to have general
capacities
-
learning is not a general
capacity
-
Garcia's rats: could learn
to avoid food when paired with a negative response, but couldn't learn
to avoid particular noises/lights when paired with same negative responses
-
adaptations that allow rats
to detect bad food but no mechanisms to detect noises or lights linked
with sickness
-
some things are easier to
learn than others
-
abilities that are easiest
and most natural are those shaped by natural selection
-
additional characteristics
of psychological adaptations (Cosmides & Tooby)
-
develop w/o conscious effort
or formal instruction
-
used w/o any conscious awareness
of their underlying logic
point for discussion:
-
environment of evolutionary
adaptedness (EEA)
-
social problems as a mismatch
between EEA and current environments
similar adaptations
across species imply:
-
developed when the different
species last shared a common ancestor, or
-
developed multiple times
for different species in response to similar selection pressures (EEAs)
-
human line evolved over last
1 million+ years
-
only 1% of that time (last
10,000-15,000 years) in settled communities w/ agriculture or industry
-
no psychological adaptations
evolved in the context of agr./industrial societies (too recent)
-
foraging (hunter/gatherer)
societies
-
gathering fruits, vegetables,
nuts, insects
-
hunting game
-
nomadic
-
small populations (bands,
probably no more than 200 persons)
Role of environment,
situation, and context in expression of psychological adaptations:
1) historical environment
led to adaptations
2) ontogenetic, or developmental,
context influences when adaptations kick in
3) immediate situational
context determines when many mechanisms come online
-
different environments stimulate
expression of different adaptations to different degrees, hence cross-cultural
variability
Proximate vs. ultimate
explanations
-
proximate - immediate causes
-
ultimate - causes on an evolutionary
timescale
Testing evolutionary
theory
-
broad outlines very well
established
-
lower level theories = where
change occurs
We'll focus on universal
psychological adaptations - "human nature," not behavioral genetics (links
between genes and individual differences in adaptations)
Evolution and free will
-
adaptations give fair amount
of flexibility, but also
-
circumscribe the range of
possibilities
Naturalistic fallacy
- determining what "ought" to be by observing what "is"
Summary:
-
many domain-specific psychological
adaptations
-
learning is not a general
capacity
-
other characteristics of
adaptations = develop w/o conscious effort, used w/o awareness of logic
-
environment of evolutionary
adaptedness
-
no adaptations evolved in
agricultural/industrial societies
-
proximate vs. ultimate levels
of explanation
-
environment activates adaptations
-
free will
-
naturalistic fallacy