Crime
-
crime - acquiring resources
illegally (property crimes) and/or asserting control over others through
violence (personal crimes)
-
crime result of status competition
1) factors associated w/
crime
2) graffiti and murder
3) sample interventions
known to prevent crime
correlates/risk factors/predictors
of crime
-
people w/ characteristics
more likely to commit crimes
-
research w/ longitudinal
designs
demographic factors:
-
male sex
-
adolescence and early adulthood
-
lower socioeconomic status
-
race: black > white > Asian
-
child abuse and neglect,
poor family management
-
family violence
-
family history of crime
-
single parent family
-
family size (many siblings)
-
perinatal difficulties (preterm
delivery, low birthweight, etc.)
-
minor physical abnormalities
-
brain damage
-
unhealthy communities (high
levels of crime and violence, physical deterioration, low attachment to
neighborhood, low life expectancy)
-
many/most w/ these characteristics
don't turn to crime, but most criminals have several
male sex
-
U.S. men committed 90-9%
of serious crimes in 1992
-
women limited in # of kids
they can have
-
women choosy about mates,
seek men able/willing to provide for kids
-
therefore, women more risk-averse,
don't compete for status involving violence, potential legal penalty
-
women compete w/ each other
on those characteristics men value in mates (appearance, nurturing, friendliness,
intelligence, fidelity)
-
men unlimited in # of kids
they can have
-
therefore, strong urge to
compete for status even w/ risk is adaptive
-
sex ratio: men > women --->
less crime; women > men ---> more crime
-
women choosier when there
are more men, which promotes men's status striving in legal ways
adolescence and young adulthood
-
competition for resources/status
most intense/crucial at life stage when competing for mates
-
demographic shifts influence
crime rate (e.g., w/ many young males, crime goes up)
race/lower socioeconomic
status
-
individuals or groups most
inhibited from rising in status in legal ways
-
higher status persons use
their higher status to commit crimes to acquire more resources (e.g., income
tax fraud)
child abuse and neglect,
poor family management, family violence, family history of crime
-
most critical during early
years when individual acquires basic models of social world
single parent family, family
size (many children)
-
children receive fewer resources
from parents (tangible & intangible)
perinatal difficulties, minor
physical abnormalities, brain damage
-
difficulties w/ learning,
parent attachment to children
unhealthy communities
(high levels of crime and violence, physical deterioration, low attachment
to neighborhood, low life expectancy)
-
trigger psych. mechanisms
for expectations
r/K strategies
-
r - reproductive success
(mating effort)
-
K - inclusive fitness (parenting
effort)
-
demographic factors promote
cognitive and behavior patterns that strain toward r-selection
dispositional/behavioral
correlates and precursors to crime:
-
impulsiveness
-
hyperactivity
-
risk-taking and sensation/excitement
seeking
-
early and persistent antisocial
behavior
-
academic failure
-
lack of commitment to school
-
drug/alcohol use
-
promiscuity and unstable
romantic relationships
-
association with criminal
others
-
not necessarily pathologies,
but normal and perhaps adaptive responses to particular environments
Brewer & Miller
discussion
-
emic/etic
-
network density - how connected
persons are to each other by social ties
Fleisher discussion
-
reproductive benefits of
gang membership--males' number of sex partners increases after joining
gang, decreases after leaving gang
Murder (Wilson & Daly)
-
males killing males make
up the overwhelming proportion of same-sex murders (about 95-6%)
-
precipitating factors/motives:
-
trivial altercations involving
perceived slights/insults or arguments
-
restricted to interactions
between nonrelatives
-
account for approx. 40% of
murders
-
reputations/face/honor/relative
status on the line
-
especially true w/ lower
status persons
"When you've got nothing,
you've got nothing to lose" - Bob Dylan
in EEA and some current environments,
losers in interactions drop in status, more likely vicitimized & spurned
as mates
-
robbery homicides have element
of status competition
-
other common precipitants
or motives:
-
conflicts over money/business
social context and characteristics
of players involved influence whether conflict erupts into violence
murder facilitated by weapons
that make killing easy (in evolutionary past, poor fighters had fewer means
to kill)
Cognitive evidence for precipitants
and motives for murder (Kenrick & Sheets)
-
sex differences in frequency
and length of homicidal fantasies
-
ever had a fantasy?
men = 79%, women = 58%
-
frequent fantasies?
men = 38%, women
= 8%
-
length? men = few minutes,
women = few seconds
-
precipitants/triggers:
-
personal threat (men = 71%,
women = 52%)
-
something stolen from you
(men = 57%, women = 42%)
-
curiosity about killing (men
= 32%, women = 8%)
-
conflict over money (men
= 27%, women = 10%)
-
public humiliation (men =
59%, women = 45%)
-
targets of fantasized homicides:
-
stranger (men = 53%, women
= 33%)
-
national leader (men = 34%,
women = 17%)
-
boss (men = 35%, women =
21%)
Summary
-
murder most often outgrowth
of conflicts over status and resources, especially among persons predisposed
to settle conflicts violently
Interventions to Prevent
Crime (sampling)
critical learning periods
for acquiring r/K strategy
-
Perry Preschool (Schweinhart,
Barnes, Weikart)
-
poor African-American children
in Michigan in early 1960s randomly assigned to:
a) cognitively-oriented
preschool with weekly home visits by teacher to guide parents in kids'
educational tasks, or
b) no preschool program/home
visits
-
children followed through
to age 27, outcomes measured through interviews and official records
-
improved intellectual and
academic performance
-
90 or higher IQ at age 5:
program = 64%, control
= 27%
program = 71%, control
= 54%
-
prevented criminal behavior
program = 7%, control
= 35%
program = 57%, control
= 69%
program = 40%, control
= 8%
-
mean # out-of-wedlock births
program = 1.0, control
= 1.7
program = 4%, control
= 23%
program = 32%, control
= 54%
program = 22, control
= 19
program and control =
26%
program = 6.2, control
= 3.3
prog. = 52%, control
= 21%
prog. = $1,368, cont.
= $830
-
cost effective - each dollar
spent on program saved public $7.16
-
Childhaven (Moore, Armsden,
Gogerty - Seattle)
-
therapeutic daycare for abused
and neglected children (about 1 year old)
-
parent training, support,
social services referral
-
kids randomly assigned to
Childhaven or standard community/CPS services
-
by age 12-13, Childhaven
kids had more positive home enviroments and caregiver-child relationships
Childhaven = 26%, control
= 38%
-
serious/violent crime record
Childhaven = 4%, control
= 24%
-
Policing - intensified motorized
patrol (Scnelle et al.)
-
alternating periods of 9-5
helicopter and car patrol vs. car patrol only in high burglary area in
Nashville
-
substantial decrease in burglaries
during helicopter patrol period
-
no spillover of burglaries
into other neighborhoods
-
simply reduces opportunity
to commit crime
Summary:
-
preschool, therapeutic child
care for abused/neglected children, and intensified police patrol each
can prevent crime appreciably and are cost-effective
-
address risk factors during
critical periods that shape the development of criminal behavior and r-strategies,
or reduce opportunities to commit crime