The purpose of this assignment is to develop
an
appreciation for knowledge production as practiced in an academic
environment,
to practice collaborative learning, to gain confidence in the use of
academic
resources, and to practice academic writing.
You will complete this assignment in stages
throughout the course. The final result will be a research proposal
outlining and
justifying the knowledge project that you would pursue were you able to
continue your exploration after this course. You may choose to continue
to collaborate with your group as a whole, or you may work in smaller
affiliations
if your research interests take you in different directions. In
my
experience, the more collaboratively you work, the better the final
product
will be. For some excellent, general suggestions about working in
groups,
please
visit Prof. Michael Goldberg's web page at <http://faculty.uwb.edu/mgoldberg/students/groupskills.html>. (Your cluster will
need to decide which suggestions to heed. Some might be more
appropriate than others.)
Please use the Discussion Board in your cluster's Group Pages in Blackboard as you work together on your project throughout the course. Please use only the Discussion Board in your Group Pages in Blackboard rather than personal e-mail so that everyone in your cluster has access to the same information. If I do not see substantive postings from a cluster member, I will assume that the individual declined to contribute much.
Assignment
Calendar
Thursday, Jan. 12: Assignment presented in class. Research clusters formed in class.
Tuesday, Jan. 24: Preliminary mapping of research topics in class.
Tuesday,
Jan. 31: Guided research in class.
Thursday,
Feb. 2: Guided research in class.
Tuesday, Feb. 14: Free time in computer classroom.
Thursday,
Feb. 16: Free time in computer classroom. OPTIONAL working research
question or annotated bibliography or both (in Microsoft Word) due to
David as
an e-mail
attachment by 8:35 a.m.
Tuesday,
Feb. 21, 8:35 a.m. sharp: Research proposal due to groupmates in Blackboard's Group Pages.
Thursday, March 9, 8:35 a.m. sharp: Final version of paper due in learning portfolio, AND required "roles" report due in Blackboard's Group Pages (but I strongly recommend submitting this earlier, by a deadline your cluster members agree upon), AND optional e-mail message to David evaluating other cluster members' contributions.
Riches for Research.™
c/o Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences
Box 358530
18115 Campus Way NE
Bothell, WA 98011-8246
January 12, 2006
Dear Sir or Madam:
We understand that you are on your way to earning a bachelor's degree at the University of Washington, Bothell. We know that the graduates of that institution are consistently bright, well-rounded, thoughtful, perceptive, and creative (perhaps partly as a result of the outstanding professors there). We therefore believe that you have all the makings of an excellent researcher. We are prepared to offer you $100,000 to conduct research on an education-related topic of your choice if we select a proposal that you submit. Please carefully review the documentation below. We look forward to reading your proposal.
Sincerely,
David S. Goldstein, Ph.D.
Founder and President
In your proposal, which should run from 1250
to 1500 words (according to the word count tool in Microsoft Word, not
counting the required Works Cited page), you should cover the
following
four elements, and each
section corresponding to these parts should be clearly labeled as such:
I will place a sample proposal in Course Documents area of Blackboard (but keep in mind that the assignment might have changed somewhat since that paper was written, so your paper will not be quite the same).
As a group, you and your colleagues will
decide how much feedback to provide one another on your research
proposals. I
ask only that every group member agree to the group's decision and
follow
through with it. Your goal is the same as mine: we both want your paper
to be as good as possible by the time the final version gets into your
portfolio
for me to grade.
Research Presentation: Because I want your classmates to benefit from your learning, and because I want to give you the opportunity to practice oral presentations, you will present, along with your research cluster, a summary of your work in class on Thursday, March 9. Each research cluster will have approximately five minutes of class time per member in order to present and discuss the knowledge travels that have led you from the course materials, through various (inter)disciplinary archives (sites of study) and methods of inquiry, to new knowledge and questions. You can think of your presentation as a travelogue, a slide show, or picture album. But remember how difficult it is to make one's own travels interesting to others. You will need to edit the documentation of your experiences, and use your time well. As you edit, focus on two points of interest: how and why the original question/problem posed by your group may have changed during the course of your travels, and how your work has expanded what you think about when you think about the aims of education. As always in good presentations, try to balance the information and ideas you will present to the class with opportunites for open discussion. I strongly recommend reading Prof. Michael Goldberg's "Tips for Oral Presentations" at <http://faculty.washington.edu/davidgs/Oral.html> as you work on your group's presentation.
Revision/Final Version: If you like, you may revise your research proposal based on your cluster members' comments and on mine, which I will provide for all research proposals submitted in Blackboard's Group Pages by the deadline of 8:35 a.m. on Tuesday, Feb. 21. (You do not need to submit your proposal to me for comments because I will download it from Blackboard if it is posted by the deadline. I strongly recommend getting comments from a Writing Center consultant (<http://www.bothell.washington.edu/writingcenter/>), as well as from me. Using what you learned in the Revision Workshop that we will conduct or have conducted for your essay assignment (see the syllabus for the date of this event), and from your peers' critiques of your paper (if your group decided to provide such critiques for each other) and on my comments (which will be general but not specific, so I encourage you to provide comments for one another), you may revise your paper, still adhering to the length requirements outlined above for your original paper. Remember to do a word count to check the length. Remember that it must be a Word document, and must be saved as a Word document using the "Save As" command in Word's File menu. I will e-mail my comments to you in about one week. (I will not respond to papers submitted after the Feb. 21 deadline because I will have run out of time that I allotted for this work.) I will not grade this version, but, in addition to providing comments, I will indicate whether I feel it is an early, middle, or late draft. (See <http://faculty.washington.edu/davidgs/WritingAssess.html>.) Please note that I expect this version to be as good as you possibly can make it. If it appears that you did not make a serious effort to make this version a final draft, I will not provide comments on it.Criteria for grading the final version of your research proposal. Please carefully read "Criteria for Assessing Writing" at <http://faculty.washington.edu/davidgs/WritingAssess.html> for an explanation of these items:
Content 50 percent Organization 10 percent Reasoning 20 percent Rhetoric 10 percent Conventions 10 percent TOTAL 30 percent of final course grade
Roles Document:
No later than 8:35 a.m. on Thursday, March 9, your cluster will
submit, in
the "Group
Pages" of Blackboard,
a single Word document that
describes, briefly, what each cluster member did for the cluster's
research
that led to your individual or collective proposals and collective
presentation. Optional: After your cluster posts its
"Roles" document, you may e-mail me, separately, no later than 8:35
a.m. on Tuesday, March 14, to give me a
very
brief, narrative evaluation of what each cluster member contributed,
which
I will use as a "checks and balances" in conjunction with the
self-reported
descriptions and my own observations. If you do not know what a
particular
cluster member did, please just say so. Your comments will
remain
confidential. Be sure to
read your
cluster's
"Roles" document, which should be posted by your cluster before the
deadline stated at the top of this assignment sheet, before you
write
your evaluations. Some of your cluster members might have
done
work
that you did not know about.
Some additional advice:
This page last updated January 13, 2006.