BIS 300A
Interdisciplinary Inquiry
Winter 2010
David S.
Goldstein, Ph.D.
Article Abstract Assignment
due in Blackboard Group Pages Discussion Board at 10:45
a.m. sharp on Wednesday, Feb. 10
The purpose of this assignment is to
practice the important skills of reading and summarizing scholarly articles
and to help you and your cluster members learn about your chosen topic. It is meant to address the following learning goals for the course:
- Understand and appreciate the interdisciplinary production of knowledge and the ways in which it underwrites different aspects of the IAS Program;
- Gain a critical understanding of the IAS Program's diverse and interrelated (inter)disciplinary fields and methods of inquiry;
- Become better critical thinkers and writers, capable of posing, answering, and reposing a variety of complex questions;
- Become better researchers, able to use the resources at UWB and elsewhere in order to identify existing and complementary scholarly work while producing original knowledge through data gathering and interpretation.
Each member of your research cluster
will post one article abstract. To do that, follow these steps:
- First, select the one scholarly
article you have found in a peer-reviewed
journal that you think would be of most interest to your
cluster members. (If you are unsure how to identify a scholarly article, read
the Campus Library's guide at http://library.uwb.edu/guides/sources.html. It is o.k. if more than one group member chooses
the same article to abstract. Check Ulrich's Periodicals Directory to
make sure your journal is peer-reviewed. Note that not everything in a
peer-reviewed journal is necessarily a research article. Some journals
include book reviews, editorials, and other non-article content which cannot
be used for this assignment. In other words, use your skills to
determine whether your chosen article is from a peer-reviewed journal
and is an original research article
. Consult a librarian or me if you
have any questions about a source you want to
use.
- If your article includes its own abstract,
or you have found an abstract of your article somewhere else, I strongly
recommend that you do not read it! It is difficult not to be influenced by an abstract written
by someone else, and it makes it harder to produce your own based only on your
own critical reading and thinking. Moreover, you run the risk of using
too much of the original abstract, either intentionally or unintentionally,
which can lead to academic integrity problems. It is important to avoid
the appearance of using someone else's intellectual property without
attribution.
- Then, read "Writing
Abstracts" at http://leo.stcloudstate.edu/bizwrite/abstracts.html.
- Then, write an informative abstract
of 200 to 300 words, following the "Writing Abstracts" guide.
Please write your document in Microsoft Word. Although the "Writing
Abstracts" web site example is single-spaced and does not contain full publication
information, please make sure that your abstract is double-spaced and
contains, anywhere in the document, the article's full publication information:
full title, author, journal title, and publication date, and full information
about the database from which it was retrieved, if any (e.g., ProQuest. Retrieved
13 Jan. 2010.). Please use a standard academic
header as shown in item #20 in "Tips for Better Prose" at http://faculty.washington.edu/davidgs/Prose.html
(which does not count toward the word count).
- Name your Word file Lastname300Abstract
(with your own last name, with identical capitalization and no spaces), like
this:
Mahone300Abstract
- Finally, no later
than 10:45 a.m. on Wednesday, Feb. 10,
post your abstract in Blackboard. To do so, log onto
Blackboard and click on "Communication,"
then on "Group Pages." Click on your research cluster link, and then
on "Discussion Board." Then click on the "Article Abstracts" link and
then on my message. Click on the "Reply" button and attach your abstract, which
must be a Word document, to your message.
Your abstract will be graded on the
following criteria:
Completeness and
accuracy
|
80 percent
|
Conventions
|
20
percent
|
TOTAL
|
5 percent
of course grade
|
This page last updated January 25, 2010.
Back to BIS 300A
Gateway