What are they & how are they related to justifications
for action?
Positive claims – statements
about what we know.
Normative claims – statements
about what we value or ÒshouldÓ value
Positive
claim - essential
concern is about how things are, not how they should be.
In this regard, all scientific claims and questions are positive.
Examining
evidence is a powerful and
often effective means for resolving disagreements
over positive
claims.
Normative
claim – essential concern is about how things should be; claims that
something is good or bad, right or wrong,
virtuous, wise or foolish, just or unjust,
etc.
Normative
questions & claims always
involve value judgments; hence, basis for believing that they have right or wrong answers is much weaker than for positive questions.
Unstated assumptions behind an argument can be normative as well as positive.
Mixing of normative and positive claims with powerful unstated assumptions, obfuscates & obstructs
reasoned deliberations on public policy, creates confusion, exacerbates conflict, makes it difficult
for citizens to understand an
argument and arrive at an informed view.