Return to Home Page
Figure 3.9  The Younger Dryas climate events
Figure 3.10  Climate Change over 140,000 years
Figure 3.11  400 years of Sunspot observations
Figure 3.12  Global surface temperature & sunÕs energyls reaching top of atmosphere
Figure 3.13  Average annual surface temperature
Figure 3.14  World Ocean Heat Content
Figure 3.16 Reconstructions of global temperature for past 1300 yers
Figure 3.17  Stages of last interglacial
Figure 3.19  Greenland ice sheet
Russia: A Nation in the Throws of climate change
Brief Outline
Climate Change Debate - Climate Skeptics
Evidence for Global Warming (GW)
Potential Positive Aspects of Global Warming for Russia
Negative Aspects of GW for Russia
Very Brief Review of Russian History vis-ˆ-vis Kyoto Protocol
Also, very brief Putin/Medvedev -> PutinÕs Russian Climate Change Policy

Recent Examples/Reports of Climate Change Skepticism
Source: The Economist, March 30th-April 5th, 2013, p. 77.
Source: The Economist, March 30th-April 5th, 2013, p. 79.
Computer Model Comparison of Anthropogenic and Natural Forcing (red) vs. Only Natural Forcing (blue)
Observed Vs. modeled temperature rise since 1860

Figure 1.  Comparison between global mean surface temperature anomalies (¡C) from observations (thick black line) and AOGCM simulations forced with (a) both anthropogenic and natural forcing and (b) natural forcing only (thick gray line).

Source:  IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007 - The Physical Science Basis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Figure 9.5 in Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC, Chapter 9: ÒUnderstanding and Attributing Climate Change,Ó p. 684.
Normal cover of Arctic Sea Ice
Dramatic changes
 in
Arctic Sea
ice minimum
Arctic Ice
Arctic sea ice 2012 minimum
Recent classification of perspectives on Climate Change/Global Warming
Some Evidence of Global warming*
Potential Positive (??) Impacts of Global Warming for Russia
Offshore production and transport due to Arctic sea-ice reductions, longer navigation season
Savings on space heating
Uncertain implications for surface land transit
Agriculture implications mixed

Climate Change in the Arctic:
Beating a retreat

The Economist
September 24th, 2011
p. 99
Land & Ocean Temperatures: Arctic & Global
grass
 "Gas!" in Novy Urengoi, just below the Arctic Circle in far northern Russia
NATALIA KOLESNIKOVA / AFP / GETTY
Temperature Anomalies from 2006, Fig. 10.32b is looks similar, but is more recent from Jan.-June 2010, p. 286.
Projected changes in Annual Temperatures for the 2050s
Surface Temperature Projections, (Source: IPCC 2007)
Permafrost Regions in the FSU
Projected future changes in northern Asia permafrost boundary under the SRES A2 scenario for 2100 (IPCC)
Scenes from
NorilÕsk and Talnakh
Evidence of melting permafrost in Siberian forest.  NASA photo
Major natural gas producing and prospective regions & pipelines
Map of Transneft and CIS Main Oil Pipelines
Siberian forest fires
Russia & Climate Change: Some Key Points
Some Negative Climate Impacts on Russian Energy Sector of Climate Change
Stability of energy infrastructure - drilling platforms and pipelines
Over 7400 accidents related to permafrost melting in W. Siberia reported in 2007
$1.8 billion spent annually on pipeline accidents and upkeep
Extreme weather events amount to ~$2 billion/yr
Huge infrastructure implications of permafrost melting for  water supply and sewer systems
Implications for permafrost melting on Novaya Zemlya -radioactive waste storage

Fossil Fuel Usage per Capita
What has been RussiaÕs history regarding Kyoto?
Duma (2003) WWF (Dec. 2003) survey of Duma - <25% favor, >50% ratification possible, >25% opposed
2003  250 RAS members sign NGO petition favoring adoption of Kyoto
Jan. 2004 Chair State DumaÕs international affairs committee says parliamentary hearings would be held spring 2004
Lots of controversy late winter to autumn 2004
May 2004, Putin has  WTO accession talks with EU
Sept 23, 2004, Ministry of Natural Resources formally recommends Kyoto Approval
Sept 27, 2004, Illarionov compares Kyoto Protocol to Fascism
Sept 30, 2004, Russian Cabinet of Ministers approves federal law to ratify Kyoto
Nov 18, 2004, Russia ratifies Kyoto
Feb 16, 2005, Kyoto Protocol enters into force
Feb 2006 161 nations have ratified Kyoto Protocol

President MedvedevÕs words Feb. 18, 2010,shortly after Copenhagen climate talks
Scenarios for Russian CO2 emissions assuming growth rates of 2, 4, 6, and 7.2% (GDP doubling in 10 years) for fast and slow intensity improvements
Kyoto Cross
Points in MedvedevÕs remarks to several ministers & senior aids
Russia and climate change policy
RussiaÕs increasingly passive role in international climate policy
Ratification of Kyoto
Political factors (WTO) without so far very meaningful policy changes
7 year wait before Russia signed Kyoto Protocol
trading carbon credits
Siberian forest for carbon sequestration
Poznan Conference of Parties (COP Dec. 2008)
Russia asserted 25-40% reduction in  CO2 emissions in 2020 compared to 1990  ÒunreasonableÓ
asserted binding commitments must be interpreted as both Òflexible, and Ònon-enforceable, non-punitiveÓ
Some early hopeful signs under Medvedev
June 2009 Medvedev proposed RussiaÕs target as 10-15% below 1990 levels
Dec. 2009 Medvedev increased reduction target to 20-25%
Resent Russian retreat
Putin words set of tone of retreat and Russian backtracking since signing Kyoto.
Upshot - Russia seems to imply that the problems of reducing GHGs is really a Chinese and American problem.

Russia at Copenhagen COP-15, Dec. 2009
Just prior, Medvedev signed Russian Climate Doctrine:
acknowledged harmful effects of climate change
outlined measures for adaptation (permafrost melting, infrastructure collapse, N-S spread of disease
mitigation measures
states need to account for economic, social and other policy consequences of climate change
Medvedev attends saying ÒRussia is ready to play active partÉÓ
Russia agreed to provide funding for Copenhagen Green Climate Fund (financing for adaptation and mitigation activities in LDCs)
February 1, 2010, RussiaÕs plans for GHG reducing commitment to 15-25% of 1990 levels stipulating:
on condition that all major emitters coming to legally binding agreement
RussiaÕs forestsÕ CO2 absorption being accounted, but not forest management -I.e., forest harvests
March 2010 Medvedev instructed Russian Security Council to approve package of implementation measures
Measures were to be drafted into laws and regulations by October 1, 2010

Hum, clear evidence of global warming in Russia?