Back ] Home ] Up ] Next ]

Life Cycle Assessment Practitioner Survey

  • Cooper, J.S., J. Fava "Life Cycle Assessment Practitioner Survey: Summary of Results," Journal of Industrial Ecology (2006)

  • Cooper, J.S., J. Fava "The Life Cycle Assessment Practitioners Survey: Assessment Methods for Evolutionary and Revolutionary Electronic Products," Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment (2006)

Over the past several years, significant progress has been made in building Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) capacity throughout the world. Some of this progress is described and discussed in the column "LCA in North America" published in the Journal of Industrial Ecology. Topics have included teaching LCA at Universities (Volume 3 Issue 2/3 and Volume 4 Issue 4), the UNEP/SETAC Life-Cycle Initiative (Volume 5 Issue 4), LCA and sustainable development indicators (Volume 7 Issue 1), and most recently an Update on Capacity Building (Volume 8 Issue 3).

In this survey, we were interested in learning more about who is using LCA, how LCA is being used, what barriers exist to increased and improved use of LCA, and how to overcome those barriers. The survey questions and results follow.

Survey Questions

1. What sector is your organization in? (Academia; Accommodation and food services; Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting; Arts, entertainment, and recreation; Building and construction; Educational services; Finance and insurance; Government - multi lateral; Government - national; Government - regional; Health care and social assistance; Information; Legal services; Management of companies and enterprises; Manufacturing - Automotive and other transport; Manufacturing - Chemicals and plastics; Manufacturing - Electronic and electric equipment; Manufacturing - Other; Metals and mining; Non government organization (NGO);  Other; Professional, scientific and technical services/ Consulting; Public administration; Real estate, rental, and leasing; Retail trade; Transportation and warehousing; Utilities; Waste management and remediation; or Wholesale trade)

2. What is your primary role in your organization? (Business management; College or university education and research; Environmental, Health, and Safety Management; K-12 education; Marketing and sales; Other; Product and process design/ product steward; Professional education; Public policy; Purchasing; or Research and development)

3. What is your involvement in LCA? (select any of the following options that apply- Assessment; Data collection; Data dissemination; Decision-making using LCA results; Investment; Marketing / Developing environmental product declarations; Project/ Research funding; Tool development; Other involvement (identify))

4. How are your LCA results used? (select any of the following options that apply- As input into product or process design; In business strategy; In education; In policy development; In procurement; In research and development; In sales; Labeling / Product declarations; Other (identify))

5. How many LCA studies have you conducted or contributed to in the following categories: Streamlined LCAs; Economic input-output LCAs or Hybrid economic input-output LCAs; LCAs following ISO14040 for use inside a company; LCAs following ISO14040 for use outside a company

6. Concerning peer review:

a. How many LCA studies have you conducted or contributed to in the following categories: No peer review; Internal company peer review; Third party, single person, external peer review; Third party, panel, external peer review

b. Were the majority of these peer reviews completed: At the end of the project; At the begining and end of the project; Interactively; Not Applicable

7. Concerning number of LCAs: How many LCA studies have you done? How many LCA studies have been done in your organization?

8. Describe environmental and/or business benefits that have resulted from your applications of LCA?

9. What type of products have been the subject of your LCAs?

10. What type of computing system do you use? (select any of the following options that apply- Off-the-shelf LCA software (identify); Spreadsheet programs such as MSExcel; Math packages such as Matlab, Mathematica, or Maple; Models developed by others in programs such as C, Java, or Fortran; Models developed by you in programs such as C, Java, or Fortran Other computing systems (identify))

11. What percentage of the inventory data you use is: collected from industry collected from LCI databases costing greater than $10,000; collected from LCI databases costing less than $10,000; collected from literature or databases not developed for LCA; modeled based on science and engineering principles

12. What impact assessment methods/tools do you use and why?

13. Do you think there should be a standard impact assessment method and why?

14. How do you capture uncertainty in your data and models?

15. What do you include in your interpretation of your LCA results?

16. What is the most time consuming part of LCA? (Goal and scope definition; Inventory data collection; Inventory data analysis; Impact data collection; Impact assessment; or Interpretation)

17. What is the most costly part of LCA? (Goal and scope definition; Inventory data collection; Inventory data analysis; Impact data collection; Impact assessment; or Interpretation)

18. What have the benefits of LCA been to your organization?

19. Why is LCA not applied to more products & processes?

20. Why is LCA not used by more members of your organization?

21. What suggestions do you have to overcome constraints or increase benefits?

Survey Results

The survey results are discussed in the archival articles listed above and are available here.

For more information, contact Associate Professor Joyce Smith Cooper at cooper@me.washington.edu