|
PHIL
100
Thinking
Things Through
|
Aristotle's Four Causes First, Aristotle's notion of cause is different from our modern notion of cause. In general, a cause for Aristotle is something you could use to answer a why question. [Why X? or alternatively, What makes this X?] In effect, it is an explanation. But Aristotle thought that there were different ways that one could explain "Why X?", and thus, there are different causes that focus on different aspects of things. [Notice that for Aristotle what we explain are substances, generally, not events (as we do with the modern notion of cause).] The 4 causes are: Material: the matter out of which a thing comes to
be
Notice that the first two causes are effectively "matter" and "form", which is how Aristotle explained static things, that is things as they are. Efficient and Final causes were needed to explain change, that is how things came into being. Rather than think about Aristotle's categories in terms of the verb "causes", it can be useful to think about it in terms of the verb "makes". The material cause is what X is made out of.
1. What is the cause of the table?
[Note the use of the verb "make" in each sentence.] 2. What is the cause of an acorn?
In the case of natural objects, Aristotle thought the purpose or end
of the thing (associated with the final cause) was internal to the object.
In effect, there was a plan for the object and its development to follow.
Thus, you can see that the formal cause and the final cause (both dealing
with the "plan" of the thing) were closely linked.
|
|
BACK
TO TOP
Last Updated: 8/28/03 |